Actually, I'm pretty sure Turkey, Israel, and Gaza would all agree that whoever's fault the Mavi Marmara was, there was no randomness. Then they'd get back to arguing over the legality of the blockade, the list of barred items, who used lethal force first on the MM, whether things were done right with the other boats, what the flotilla was trying to do (feed the hungry or just stick it to the Man?), whether or not Israel is the Man...and eventually it circles back around to the same old topics.
And in the other nations? One side condemns, the other defends, because that's what their side does. The truth only matters for justification after the fact, and it's not even the only way to do that.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
branchandroot
no subject
Date: 2010-06-18 03:46 am (UTC)And in the other nations? One side condemns, the other defends, because that's what their side does. The truth only matters for justification after the fact, and it's not even the only way to do that.